<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Graphical User Interface Design - Rossul Design &#187; Web Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rossul.com/tag/web-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rossul.com</link>
	<description>Thinking inside usability box</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:49:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Display resolution statistics January 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/display-resolution-statistics-january-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/display-resolution-statistics-january-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on latest data from w3schools 76 % of users surf the web with their motor set to resolution higher than 1024&#215;768, which is currently accepted minimum standard for web site designers.

20% of the market sound like a lot but on other hand this number will inevitably become smaller and smaller every month. Many designers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on latest data from <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_resolution_higher.asp" target="_blank">w3schools</a> <strong>76 %</strong> of users surf the web with their motor set to resolution <strong>higher than 1024&#215;768</strong>, which is currently accepted minimum standard for web site designers.<span id="more-1509"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rossul.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Screen-shot-2010-02-07-at-11.42.44-AM.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1521   alignnone" title="Monitor resolution statistics - January 2010" src="http://www.rossul.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Screen-shot-2010-02-07-at-11.42.44-AM.png" alt="Monitor resolution statistics as on January 2010" width="458" height="314" /></a></p>
<p>20% of the market sound like a lot but on other hand this number will inevitably become smaller and smaller every month. Many designers have moved to liquid design that gives resolutions-independent feeling, full screen browsing “friendly&#8221; and potentially makes it easier to accommodate higher resolutions in the future.</p>
<p>Still we should probably stat with 1024&#215;768 for a little longer and here is why:</p>
<ul>
<li>About 76 % of users don’t browse using full screen mode. They simultaneously chat, emil, access widgets.</li>
<li>Users that have 1600&#215;1200 and higher resolution, usually don’t used <strong>full</strong> <strong>screen</strong> and instead have multiple windows / websites open, which is more productive.</li>
<li>20% is still a significant piece of the market that should not be ignored.</li>
</ul>
<p>That being said one needs to take into account user audience demographics. Designing for b2b website for IT industry that routinely uses latest generation of computers and monitors, it would be save to go one step  up and optimize a site for 1280px. Retail sites should aim at 1024&#215;768 to be able to support casual users that don’t upgrade their hardware unless it’s necessary. Learning target audience is always a good idea that helps delivering more usable product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/display-resolution-statistics-january-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs: “No one will be using Flash. The world moves to HTML5&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/jobs-%e2%80%9cno-one-will-be-using-flash-the-world-moves-to-html5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/jobs-%e2%80%9cno-one-will-be-using-flash-the-world-moves-to-html5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent Town Hall meeting with Apple employees Steve Jobs made it clear that Flash is not coming to iPhone or iPad.
&#8220;Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it’s because of Flash. No one will be using Flash, he says. The world is moving to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a recent Town Hall meeting with Apple employees Steve Jobs made it clear that Flash is not coming to iPhone or iPad.<span id="more-1482"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it’s because of Flash. No one will be using Flash, he says. The world is moving to HTML5.”</p>
<p>With Google’s YouTube switching to HTML5 Flash takes a big hit. I’m not missing Flash on my iPhone, I try to skip Flash splash page when I run into one surfing the web and I never ever advice my clients to use Flash on their sites unless they need to build an interactive app with Cold Fusion backend. So no hard feeling about absence of Flash on future Apple devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/jobs-%e2%80%9cno-one-will-be-using-flash-the-world-moves-to-html5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Tablet Confirmed by The Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/apple-tablet-confirmed-by-the-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/apple-tablet-confirmed-by-the-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=1416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is almost certain a new device is going to be unveiled next week. We’ve heard many name variations such as iSlate and iPad &#8211;both are Apple’s registered trademarks&#8211; Apple Tablet, etc. It seems like Apple’s plans are big this time; they aim to re-shape the publishing industry (which is in an apparent crisis) as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is almost certain a new device is going to be unveiled next week. We’ve heard many name variations such as iSlate and iPad &#8211;both are Apple’s registered trademarks&#8211; Apple Tablet, etc. It seems like Apple’s plans are big this time; they aim to re-shape the publishing industry (which is in an apparent crisis) as they once re-shaped the digital music industry with iTunes and iPod. Making it easier for people to access media content for an affordable price has proved to be successful. Here is a short recap of what we know so far:</p>
<ul>
<li>Apple has been discussing with book, magazine and newspaper publishers possible ways of cooperation.</li>
<li>NYT Chairman Arthur Sulzberger, when asked about the new devices, said  “stay tuned”.</li>
<li>Orange Chief <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5445334/orange-chief-confirms-apple-tablet-with-built+in-webcam-%5Bupdated%5D" target="_blank">confirms</a> Apple Tablet With Built-In Webcam</li>
<li>Apple has been negotiating with TV networks CBS, Walt Disney and ABC for a monthly subscription service.</li>
<li>There have been rumors that Apple is going to work with Electronic Arts to position the new device as a gaming platform.</li>
<li>The device will have a web camera and be capable of live web streaming</li>
<li>Apple has been promoting an idea of backing-up users music online and accessing it on an connected device. This also supports the recent Lava acquisition. Its technology may very well find its way to iTunes 10.</li>
<li>Apple’s new $1 billion data centre in North Carolina is under construction. MobileMe will most probably have a major upgrade, possibly the “Mobile iTunes” version, and as the name suggests, possibly other things related to “Me”.</li>
</ul>
<p>Nowhereelse.fr has obtained what it says may be a video of the long-rumored Apple tablet. Whatever it is, it looks pretty cool already:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PHRSDWZC_m4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PHRSDWZC_m4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Last year, Apple’s focus shifted from computer production to content delivery. The turning point was dropping “Computers” from the company name. Since then their devices are just one unified platform that makes it easy to delivery content to end user. And, this strategy pays off very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/apple-tablet-confirmed-by-the-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Beta for Mac speed test</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/google-chrome-beta-for-mac-speed-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/google-chrome-beta-for-mac-speed-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Safari is the fastest browser on a Mac platform, approximately 12% faster than Chrome Beta according to Computerworld. Chrome easily leaves behind FireFox and Opera in JavaScript rendering performance.
On the Windows platform Chrome 3.0 shines as the fastest browser, leaving Safari behind. We might expect a speed boost in the final version of Chrome for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari is the fastest browser on a Mac platform, approximately 12% faster than Chrome Beta according to <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142004/Safari_edges_Chrome_in_Mac_speed_trials" target="_blank">Computerworld</a>. Chrome easily leaves behind FireFox and Opera in JavaScript rendering performance.</p>
<div id="attachment_1248" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 430px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1248" title="SunSpider JavaScript Benchmarks of Mac Browsers (Shorter bars represent faster performance)" src="http://www.rossul.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/chart_420.jpg" alt="SunSpider JavaScript Benchmarks of Mac Browsers (Shorter bars represent faster performance)" width="420" height="222" /><p class="wp-caption-text">SunSpider JavaScript Benchmarks of Mac Browsers (Shorter bars represent faster performance)</p></div>
<p>On the Windows platform Chrome 3.0 shines as the fastest browser, leaving Safari behind. We might expect a speed boost in the final version of Chrome for Mac, although Google has made no claims regarding Chrome JS rendering speed on Leopard.</p>
<p>JS rendering performance is important for websites and web apps that rely on JavaScript to provide rich functionality. Gmail, Google Maps, Flickr, a9, online text editors and any other site that uses AJAX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/google-chrome-beta-for-mac-speed-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Usability over Aesthetics</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/usability-over-aesthetics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/usability-over-aesthetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really admire good design, a tasteful colour palette and the fine finish of all UI elements. But Google pays no attention to any of it. Their design is completely data driven and they are known for things like testing 64 shades of blue for few months before deciding on the colour of the box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really admire good design, a tasteful colour palette and the fine finish of all UI elements. But Google pays no attention to any of it. Their design is completely data driven and they are known for things like testing 64 shades of blue for few months before deciding on the colour of the box boarder. And still I find myself dumping the beautiful Apple Mail for Gmail. I bought Things &#8211; a most eye-catching app that scored Apple Design Award and yet find myself using Gmail Tasks. Beautifully designed iCal is also an app I rarely open, opting for Google Calendar instead.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the reason? Usability I guess. Google is an adept in making usable apps. All their apps are highly intuitive and usable, albeit ugly. I save great deal of time when I have all apps in one window talking to each other. The ugliness of design elements does bother me but the usability pays me back in time saved.</p>
<p>I guess to justify Google&#8217;s approach to UI, they need to think about every bite going through their server with the amount of data they process. To a certain degree they comply with a basic rule of design: Take out everything that is not necessary until you can&#8217;t anymore and then you have a well designed product. (<a href="http://www.romaviva.com/vaticano-castel-santangelo/michelangelo-pieta.jpg" target="_blank">Michelangelo</a> used to joke that his trade is very easy. Take a rock and cut off everything unnecessary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/usability-over-aesthetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TweetBoard Alfa</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/tweetboard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/tweetboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossul.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetBoard makes Twitter available right on your website. The window is dynamic and doesn&#8217;t get in the way. It seems to be very cool and usable way to facilitate your marketing efforts and may be even communicate with your customers. We are awaiting alfa testing approval and will let you know about integration process and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TweetBoard makes Twitter available right on your website. The window is dynamic and doesn&#8217;t get in the way. It seems to be very cool and usable way to facilitate your marketing efforts and may be even communicate with your customers. We are awaiting alfa testing approval and will let you know about integration process and usability of the product.</p>
<div id="attachment_979" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tweetboard.com/alpha/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-979" title="tweetboard" src="http://www.rossul.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/tweetboard-300x232.png" alt="tweetboard" width="300" height="232" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tweetboard</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/tweetboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Link colour</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/website-link-colour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/website-link-colour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossul.com/blog/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surveys shows that average users still prefer blue text links over other colours even if they are consistent across the site. This probably doesn&#8217;t apply to web apps such as intranet site, gmail, etc that users use on daily basis. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surveys shows that average users still prefer blue text links over other colours even if they are consistent across the site. This probably doesn&#8217;t apply to web apps such as intranet site, gmail, etc that users use on daily basis. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/website-link-colour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Tasks Usable Feature &#8211; Outliner</title>
		<link>http://www.rossul.com/gmail-tasks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rossul.com/gmail-tasks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossul.com/blog/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gmail Tasks has one very useful feature. It is an outliner that lets you organize tasks into discrete sections that are related in a tree structure or hierarchy. As much as I love OS X Mail and iCal, the ability to quickly break any task into sub-tasks makes a big difference in usability.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="font-size: 13px; color: #333333; font-weight: normal; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"><span>Gmail Tasks has one very useful feature. It is an outliner that lets you organize tasks into discrete sections that are related in a tree structure or hierarchy. As much as I love OS X Mail and iCal, the ability to quickly break any task into sub-tasks makes a big difference in usability.<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-549" title="Screen shot 2009-10-25 at 10.14.58 PM" src="http://rossul.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Screen-shot-2009-10-25-at-10.14.58-PM.png" alt="Screen shot 2009-10-25 at 10.14.58 PM" width="472" height="421" /></span></h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rossul.com/gmail-tasks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
